Apple pie, baseball and NASA. They are all considered American institutions. More than this they are considered pure. When those occasional scandals rock baseball it is like a knife is driven through the heart of a great American tradition and it truly hurts a lot of people. Like baseball, NASA is considered an institution that is truly following the American tradition of truthfulness and exploration, but what if I told you that more and more people are accusing NASA of some pretty terrible things? Could NASA, the premier space agency and beacon of truth actually be just another defense agency? It turns out that is exactly what they were founded as. All one has to do is read their charter. Somehow we have come to think of them as being there only for the civilian sector of the government. So what is wrong with being a defense agency? Well for one thing that makes them very paranoid about anything that they might discover, which means secrecy. Defense agencies are very big on secrets as I am sure that you all know. For another thing they follow different policies. We tend to think that if they discover something of importance that such as alien life, no matter how primitive, that we will be told about it immediately. We couldn't be more wrong.

One of the things that has been force fed to us over the years are those reddish Martian photos, like the one on the left. Notice how red the sky is and the soil. We really believed that this was what Mars looked like and most of us still do, but this is not what it looks like at all. This is a photo taken through a red filter and beamed back to earth. The photo on the right has been adjusted to give you better idea of what Mars really looks like. It looks much more like earth. Startling isn't it? But how can we be sure that this is true, are we just to take the word of those that tell us that? No, of course not. NASA made a mistake when they were photographing on Mars through that red filter. They also photographed the Airbags on the lander deploying and they look bright red, when in fact they were an off white as can be seen in NASA's own photo of them below. Lest you think that I am some kind of genius in discovering this, I must give that credit to Hoagland and Bara who talked about this in their book Dark Mission.

These crash bags are closer to the color beige. This is a NASA photo. When you see the photo of the lander on Mars these bags look very red.

Why would anyone want to hide the true colors of Mars? It really seems like a strange question doesn't it? Let me ask you this, what would you think if it turned out that Mars looked just like earth? Might you not think that maybe, just maybe, Mars isn't rally as uninhabitable as we were led to believe. This would lead you to think that maybe there could have been other beings living there. We could take this even a step further. It seems that everything on Mars, I am talking about monuments and such are many millions of years old. Could it be that we just might find out that we all actually got here from Mars and wouldn't that explain why there were two kinds of humans on this planet at least once if not more. We know that modern humans existed at the same time as the Neanderthals, but we really don't know why. Maybe the answer is that they came from somewhere else, namely Mars. Another reason that they wouldn't want us to know that Mars is Earthlike is that we might start to think that we have put people on there. Remember that footprint that I discovered in the NASA photos? That seemed to indicate to me that something is going on there.

Here is the kicker to all of this, if we can't trust the NASA photos to give us a correct representation of the color of Mars, how can we trust NASA to be giving the straight info in any of the photos? Some say that they are cherry picking the photos. In other words what they are doing is altering or removing photos that they feel might give some info to us that they don't want us to have. An example of this is when they discover something in their hundreds of thousands of photos and they change the photo after it has already been posted. This causes people to have all different versions of photos when they think that the photos are the same because the photo numbers match. One of the things that NASA has been accused of is introducing noise into some of the photos to hide shapes. An example of this noise introduction would be in the Face On Mars. It is said the noise was introduced to hid certain geometric shapes that have been discovered to actually comprise the face. It is a pretty sad state of affairs when we are given photos to view that were supposedly just taken and yet they have 10X less resolution that those that were taken by the Viking Mission. How can there be any rational excuse for this when the equipment we are not using is of much higher resolution?

Another thing that has to be taken into account is the fact that if the Mars photos are not showing the correct colors and it sure seems to have been proven that they are not, then all of the photos of the artifacts we find on Mars are also in the wrong colors. To get an idea of what thing really look like on mars you have to darken the soil to match that of dirt and to make the sky blue. This is not the exact way Mars looks, but a close approximation. Taking some red out of the photos sometimes make the artifacts look more like a normal stone color. Remember the statue that I analyzed recently on Mars. Below is how it looked initially, but now we know the colors were wrong.

NASA Photo

Below I have listed the photo as I think it should look after we try and eliminate the red filter.

The earth has not been adjusted to what I believe the correct color is, but I have tried to adjust the color of the statue to what it would appear like. It seems to be a dark granite or some other darker rock. The problem is that these are only guesses, but I tried to base it on the fact that a red filter was probably used and this is how it would look if not filtered.

Other photos are said to have been stretch, cut, flipped upside down and squashed, just to mention a few techniques that people suspect that NASA is using. There is also the technique of leaving out colors. If you take a black and white photo of 256 shades of gray and you only leave in 16 shades, you have left out most of the photo information and NASA has been accused of doing this on at least several occasions. As I have mentioned in the past, sometimes it is said that a probe disappears, but now many suspect that maybe the probe discovered something and it was transferred into what is know as a dark program, where the public no longer gets any information on it.

All this boils down to the question, is Mars really more like Earth than we have been led to believe? We know that it can get very cold, but this doesn't mean that we couldn't exist there. We have stations in the Arctic and Antarctic areas of our own planet. It is not exactly balmy there, especially in the winter months. Living and functioning on Mars might not be as hard to do as we thought. Taking this a very huge step further, maybe there are still Martians there? They might have reverted back to a primitive species of human or humanoid. There is just so much we don't know about Mars and NASA is not making it easy to find out anything unless one is happy with false facts.